CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to support@ccsinfo.com

dsPIC33EP512MU810

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
kalyan



Joined: 16 May 2014
Posts: 7

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

dsPIC33EP512MU810
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2018 1:01 am     Reply with quote

I am developing a board using dspic33ep512mu810 ic. My doubt is whether ccs compiler supports this ic and all functions work without any problem.

Manly i2c, uart, qei.

Kindly share your feedback if you worked with this ic.
Ttelmah



Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 19195

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2018 2:38 am     Reply with quote

That's quite an 'old' chip. Been supported for at least a couple of years.

However three things:

1) CCS generally fully supports 'standard' functions, but if you start doing complex things (mixes of DMA, and sample triggers for example), these will need you to set large parts of these up yourself.
2) Generally it takes a couple of releases for some bugs in configurations to be found. However this one has been around long enough for these generally to have been spotted, but it only takes you to be trying a combination no-one else has used, for one to rear it's head.
3) This chip has a huge number of errata. Some have _no_ work round. Be careful to make sure that one of these will not affect your project. The QEI/comparator in particular have issues with virtual pin mapping. Some are really horrible, and make parts of the chip almost unusable (for instance the USB one - problem is on most modern motherboards, the USB peripheral is permanently mapped via an internal hub in many cases...).
raman00084@gmail.com



Joined: 28 Jul 2014
Posts: 38

View user's profile Send private message

errata
PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:18 am     Reply with quote

Which dsPic has less number of errata issues ? Kindly suggest.
I am going to develop a board for industrial servo control.
temtronic



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9081
Location: Greensville,Ontario

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 6:01 am     Reply with quote

Depending on 'system requirements' a dsPIC might not be needed. 20 years ago we designed a 3DOF helicopter using the 16F877 using optical encoders and DC motors. It was interesting to see it being controlled, in realtime, over the Internet.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group