CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to support@ccsinfo.com

Can't figure why bitwise op hangs the pic

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
iso9001



Joined: 02 Dec 2003
Posts: 262

View user's profile Send private message

Can't figure why bitwise op hangs the pic
PostPosted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 9:10 pm     Reply with quote

Hi.... I'm confused as to why this function hangs the pic up. I'm using an older version of ccs that I know has problems with the bit_set command, so instead of trying my luck with bit_test, I just wrote in the bitwise ops.

This function is supposed to take in an array of 3 bytes and if the bit it is currently checking is a 1 it records a 1... And a 0 gets a 0

I just cant figure out whats wrong with this thing. It just hangs the pic here.


Code:

void test(int data[]) {

 for (ct=0; ct<3; ct++)
  for (i=7; i>=0; i--) {
   if ((data[ct] & (1<<i)))
     checker[x]=1;
   else
      checker[x]=0;
  x++
 }
}
Mark



Joined: 07 Sep 2003
Posts: 2838
Location: Atlanta, GA

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

PostPosted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 9:36 pm     Reply with quote

Most likely it is because you have declared i as an int which is unsigned by default so i>=0 is always true.
Haplo



Joined: 06 Sep 2003
Posts: 659
Location: Sydney, Australia

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:06 pm     Reply with quote

Remember in CCS the variables are unsigned by default. You have to add the keyword 'signed' if you want them to cover the negative range as well.
dvsoft



Joined: 28 Nov 2003
Posts: 46

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:06 am     Reply with quote

Code:

void test (int8* Data, int ByteCnt)
{
    int8 Shift,BitCnt,i;

    i = 0;
    do {
        Shift  = Data[i];
        BitCnt = 8;
        do {
            if(Shift & 0x80)      
                checker[x] = 1;
            else
                checker[x] = 0;
            Shift <<= 1;
            x++;
         } while (--BitCnt);
    } while (++i < ByteCnt);
}
Guest








PostPosted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:42 am     Reply with quote

Ah..... stupid unsigned ints...

Thanks everyone!

btw: Dvsoft, what is that code doing ? I dont understant the & 128 part of it... Oh wait, I see... Is it comparing the first bit and then shifting everything over one so that the 2nd bit is now the first?
dvsoft



Joined: 28 Nov 2003
Posts: 46

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 3:39 am     Reply with quote

bonjour,

yes, you understood

Alain
Trampas



Joined: 04 Sep 2004
Posts: 89
Location: NC

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger

PostPosted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 6:08 am     Reply with quote

I would suggest you define your own data types to avoid this problem. For example:

typedef unsigned int8 UBYTE;
typedef unsigned int8 UINT;
typedef signed int8 INT;
typedef char CHAR;
typedef unsigned int16 UWORD;

typedef signed int16 WORD;
typedef unsigned int32 UDWORD;
typedef signed int32 DWORD;
typedef float FLOAT;

Trampas
Guest








PostPosted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 7:36 am     Reply with quote

Trampas wrote:
I would suggest you define your own data types to avoid this problem. For example:

typedef unsigned int8 UBYTE;
typedef unsigned int8 UINT;
typedef signed int8 INT;
typedef char CHAR;
typedef unsigned int16 UWORD;

typedef signed int16 WORD;
typedef unsigned int32 UDWORD;
typedef signed int32 DWORD;
typedef float FLOAT;

Trampas


ooooops, don't forget one more thing ...

#case // case sensitive !

otherwise, INT will be the same as int ? ? ? I can't remember ...

btw,

#TYPE

Syntax:
#type standard-type=size

Elements:
standard-type is one of the C keywords short,int or long. size is 1,8,16 or 32

Purpose:
By default the compiler treats SHORT as one bit, INT as 8 bits and LONG as 16 bits. The traditional C convention is to have INT defined as the most efficient size for the target processor. This is why it is 8 bits on the PICŪ. In order to help with code compatibility a #TYPE directive may be used to will allow these types to be changed. #TYPE can redefine these keywords.

Note that the commas are optional. Since #TYPE may render some sizes inaccessible (like a one bit int in the above) four keywords representing the four ints may always be used: INT1, INT8, INT16 and INT32. Be warned CCS example programs and include files may not work right if you use #TYPE in your program.

Examples:
#TYPE SHORT=8, INT=16, LONG=32
Guest
Guest







C99 Fixed Width Standard Definitions
PostPosted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 8:22 am     Reply with quote

Don't want to cause a storm here, but what about the ANSI C99 fixed width types - CCS C does accept the following C99 definitions.

Code:

/* C99 Fixed width definitions */
typedef signed int8 int8_t;
typedef unsigned int8 uint8_t;
typedef signed int16 int16_t;
typedef unsigned int16 uint16_t;
typedef signed int32 int32_t;
typedef unsigned int32 uint32_t;

static union
{
    char int8_t_incorrect   [sizeof(  int8_t) == 1]; 
    char uint8_t_incorrect  [sizeof( uint8_t) == 1]; 
    char int16_t_incorrect  [sizeof( int16_t) == 2]; 
    char uint16_t_incorrect [sizeof(uint16_t) == 2]; 
    char int32_t_incorrect  [sizeof( int32_t) == 4]; 
    char uint32_t_incorrect [sizeof(uint32_t) == 4]; 
};
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group